Area 87 (Pacific, Southeast)

Overview

What is a Prospective FIP?
Prospective FIPs intend to meet the requirements for active FIPs within one year. These projects are posted on FisheryProgress to help users identify opportunities to support developing FIPs and prevent the start of duplicate FIPs. Prospective FIPs are not yet demonstrating progress toward sustainability.

The Taiwan Tuna Longline Association (TTLA) plays a crucial role in supporting over 500 tuna longline member vessels in Taiwan. As the primary agency responsible for registering annual fishing areas for fishers according to Taiwan's fishing regulations, TTLA arranges logistics, facilitates catch reporting, and assists in obtaining fishing licenses. Independent longline vessels have come together and are now working with TTLA and Ocean Outcomes in a new project to improve environmental sustainability and social responsibility to meet international market requirements. 

The TTLA Pacific Ocean FIP aims to improve fishery management strategies, environmental oversight, and social responsibility on participating Taiwanese longline tuna fishing vessels, to prepare those vessels for Marine Stewardship Council certification. The FIP targets Pacific Ocean Albacore, Bigeye, and Yellowfin tunas. While the Pacific stock status of these species are currently not considered overfished, they lack robust precautionary harvest strategies and the tools to limit the risk of overfishing. Regional Fishery Management Organizations have been making progress on the development and adoption of such harvest strategies, but have yet to fully implement them. 

In addition to reducing environmental impacts, there are also opportunities to improve worker conditions and labor practices in the fisheries through the FIP. These opportunities for environmental and social improvements will be identified in the FIP development process and then addressed through the FIP’s implementation. Potential areas of focus include reducing bycatch, supporting new science-management measures, improving vessel working conditions, and expanding access to materials and trainings for crew.

This FIP is part of a larger effort O2 is pursuing across Northeast Asia to help lead improvement projects and certification in the longline tuna fishing sector.

The Taiwan Tuna Longline Association (TTLA) plays a crucial role in supporting over 500 tuna longline member vessels in Taiwan. As the primary agency responsible for registering annual fishing areas for fishers according to Taiwan's fishing regulations, TTLA arranges logistics, facilitates catch reporting, and assists in obtaining fishing licenses. Independent longline vessels have come together and are now working with TTLA and Ocean Outcomes in a new project to improve environmental sustainability and social responsibility to meet international market requirements. 

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
Ocean Outcomes
Organization Type 
NGO
Primary Contact 
Ho-Tu Chiang
Organization Name 
Taiwan Tuna Longline Association
Organization Type 
Other
Primary Contact 
Zhong-Lun Liu
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
23447
Expiration Date 
March 2025

Overview

The Chile Central-South Araucanian herring/common sardine and anchoveta fishery targets common sardine and anchovy in Regions V-X using purse seines. This is one of the most important fisheries in Chile, providing jobs for over 100,000 people and fishmeal for farmed salmon globally.  Key issues challenging this fishery include implementing an ecosystem-based approach to management as these are low trophic level species, assessing and mitigating bycatch, and reducing risk of IUU fishing. 

The Chile Central-South Araucanian herring/common sardine and anchoveta fishery targets common sardine and anchovy in Regions V-X using purse seines. This is one of the most important fisheries in Chile, providing jobs for over 100,000 people and fishmeal for farmed salmon globally.  Key issues challenging this fishery include implementing an ecosystem-based approach to management as these are low trophic level species, assessing and mitigating bycatch, and reducing risk of IUU fishing. 

FIP at a Glance

View current status
March 01, 2024
14% 54% 32%
Progress Rating (A) Advanced Progress

Reserved for comprehensive FIPs that have achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within the past 12 months.

(B) Good Progress

A basic FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within 12 months.

(C) Some Recent Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months that has never achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result but has reported a Stage 3 activity within the first 12 months.
(D) Some Past Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months BUT has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old AND a Stage 3 activity has been reported within six months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
(E) Negligible Progress
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old, with no Stage 3 activity reported in the last six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months with no Stage 3 activity reported within 12 months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.

The ratings are currently derived by SFP from publicly available data on FIP websites, including FisheryProgress.org, and are determined using the following methodology: View PDF

Not yet available
Actions Complete

This pie chart represents completed environmental actions. Non-completed environmental actions may contain completed sub-tasks that are not illustrated here. For more information on environmental action progress visit the Actions Progress tab.

  • Complete
  • Incomplete
Next Update Due FisheryProgress requires a FIP to provide update reports every six months, and two missed reports will render the FIP inactive. If a report is overdue, this date will appear red.
Sep 2024
Target End Date
Mar 2029
Additional Impacts:
Traceability

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
WWF Chile
Organization Type 
NGO
Primary Contact 
Mariann Breu
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
22334

Overview

What is a Prospective FIP?
Prospective FIPs intend to meet the requirements for active FIPs within one year. These projects are posted on FisheryProgress to help users identify opportunities to support developing FIPs and prevent the start of duplicate FIPs. Prospective FIPs are not yet demonstrating progress toward sustainability.

In Chile, the Chilean sea bass fishery began with surveys at the beginning of the 1960s. The artisanal fleet initially operated from the Biobio and Los Lagos regions, extending to the north and south of the country, but considering that the best yields fishing were observed towards the south. Currently there is an operational artisanal fleet throughout the country. Artisanal Chilean Sea Bass fishing has special treatment in Chile, allowing artisanal vessels to travel between political regions, allowing them to visit fishing sites far from their home port. The southern operating limit of the artisanal fleet was established at parallel 47° LS, however, in the last two decades incursions towards the south became more frequent. The fishing gear used by the artisanal fleet is the bottom longline.

In Chile, there are two administrative units of the Chilean Sea Bass, one with global capture quotas, which is known as the Artisanal Fishing Area (APA in Spanish) and the Tendered Fisheries Unit (UPL) that operates with a special regime, but It is predominantly industrial. The geographical limit of both administrative units is parallel 47° LS. Chilean Sea Bass is a highly desired resource, with a highly integrated fleet and processing industry, and with a very extensive value chain, with several relevant elements and processes. Requiring markets are demanding in terms of sustainability, therefore advancing in these aspects is imperative to maintain competitiveness.

On the part of the technical background for the evaluation and management, some relevant shortcomings are evident that do not allow access to sustainability certification processes or similar, which is why an effort from stakeholders is required to move forward. In administrative terms, the situation is complex, since two access regimes and two types of extractive fleets coexist, with the definition of the status of the resource and knowledge of the Bycatch being one of the main current problems. This proposal is expected to establish the bases to work on an improvement program with the artisanal fleet that operates in Chile, both in the artisanal fishing area and the fraction of the fleet of less than 18 meters in length that enters the tendered area. It is expected to establish a progressive program for the incorporation of artisanal vessels, starting with those that have shown interest in participating.

Given the problem declared by the fishery administration, the greatest effort of this proposal will focus on strengthening the information necessary to prepare the diagnosis of the fishery, interactions with Bycatch, and some social aspects and good practice agreements.

In Chile, the Chilean sea bass fishery began with surveys at the beginning of the 1960s. The artisanal fleet initially operated from the Biobio and Los Lagos regions, extending to the north and south of the country, but considering that the best yields fishing were observed towards the south. Currently there is an operational artisanal fleet throughout the country. Artisanal Chilean Sea Bass fishing has special treatment in Chile, allowing artisanal vessels to travel between political regions, allowing them to visit fishing sites far from their home port.

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
Alejandro Karstegl
Organization Type 
Consultant
Primary Contact 
Alejandro Karstegl
Phone 
+56999173970
Organization Name 
Comercializadora Costa del Mar SPA
Organization Type 
Industry
Primary Contact 
Macarena Herrera Campos
Phone 
+569 6220980
Organization Name 
Congelados y frescos del Mar SA
Organization Type 
Industry
Primary Contact 
Juan Eduardo Corvalan
Phone 
+34674803808
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
22332
Expiration Date 
January 2025

Overview

The Chilean seabass (Patagonian toothfish) Fishery Improvement Project (FIP) aims to improve the status of the fishery to a standard that will allow it to pass a full assessment of a well-established, science-based certification program, such as the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). The project is promoted and financed by the Magallanes Seabass Operators Trade Association (AOBAC, Asociación Gremial de Operadores de Bacalao de Profundidad de Magallanes), an organization that represents the interests of industrial fishermen who fish this resource south of parallel 47ºS and includes the companies Globalpesca SpA, Pesca Chile S.A., and Pesca Cisne S.A.

The FIP is led by the Fishing Study Center (CEPES, Centro de Estudios Pesqueros), an organization with extensive experience in stock assessment and sustainable use of the resources of the southern austral zone of Chile, including Chilean seabass. CEPES has historically advised AOBAC and together they have developed a series of research projects, in coordination with the fishing authority, Undersecretary of Fishery (SUBPESCA Subsecretaría de Pesca), providing scientific information valuable for its management (https://www.aobac.cl/cepes).

The Chilean sea bass is a deep sea fish with a wide geographical distribution range in the Southern Hemisphere, mainly associated with the cold Antarctic and Southern Ocean waters, extending to the Eastern Pacific, Western Pacific, and Southwest Atlantic. It is a species of high commercial interest due to its high price in the markets and is known internationally as Chilean seabass, Patagonian toothfish and Black hake. Industrial extraction in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Chile, south of the 47°S parallel began in 1989 in an exploratory fisheries framework. After only three years,  was development the commercial fishing, which was early ordered by a set of measures aimed mainly at limiting access, avoid the excessive growth of fishing effort and regulating catch rates. Currently, the industrial fleet is composed of five factory longliners (freezers) that fish on the slope, between 1000 and 2500 m in depth. Until 2005, the predominant fishing gear was the longline (Spanish system), which was almost completely replaced in 2008 by the chilean longline (cachalotera), a technological innovation in fishing gear developed to avoid depredation of the catch by mammals (sperm whales and killer whales) during the recovery phase of the fishing set. This new fishing gear has additionally incorporated other improvements in its design that have significantly reduced bird interaction and mortality and have contributed to improved fishing yields. In the last decade, the landings of the industrial fleet have been very stable, around 1200 t, with increasing yields per hook in the recent six-year period. The 2022 landing of the AOBAC fleet, which owns 75% of the auctioned industrial fishing quota, was 1284 t equivalent to 73% of the total landing in the fishery area. Since 2015 the fishery has had a discard monitoring program, which has onboard cameras that continuously film fishing operations on all vessels. Estimated discard values are low, only 2% of the total Chilean seabass catch is discarded due to specimens damaged by the action of mammals or other operational factors inherent to the fishing activity that decrease its commercial value.

Overall fisheries in Chile are regulated under the General Law for Fishery and Aquaculture (LGPA, Ley General de Pesca y Aquicultura), which provides the regulatory framework for sustainable management of hydrobiological resources and their environment in Chile, through the application of the precautionary and ecosystemic approaches. Specifically, it establishes that the management strategy, based on catch quota, must reach and maintain the stock around the spawning biomass that produces the Maximum Sustained Yield (MSY). The main conservation measure is the Total Allowable Catch (TAC), allocated through individual fishing quotas, called Extraordinary Fishing Permits (PEP, Permisos Extraordinarios de Pesca) tendered in public auctions. The TAC is established annually by SUBPESCA, based on a range of Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) recommended by the Technical Scientific Committee (CCT, Comité Científico Técnico) according to the status of the stock and the control rule established in the management plan prepared by the Management Committee (CM, Comité de Manejo) of the fishery.  At present, the management plan is under development, so the CCT is temporarily applying a constant fishing mortality control rule corresponding to an exploitation rate lower than FMSY. 

The status of the Chilean EEZ stock is defined annually by two indicators of the stock assessment model, the fishing mortality rate (F) and the spawning biomass (SSB), and Biological Reference Points (BRP) based on MSY that define thresholds of spawning biomass that it is not advisable to exceed (SSBlimit), desirable levels to reach (SSBtarget) and an upper limit to fishing mortality (Flimit) equal to that produced in the long term by MSY. The spawning biomass of UoA stock in 2021 is 39% unfished spawning biomass (SSB0), very close to the target biomass (40%SSB0) and far from the depletion threshold corresponding to 20%SSB0. Thus, the UPL stock is practically in a fully fished and underfishing condition with mortality levels well below the limit (F45%SSBPR). The 2021 spawning biomass estimate has a significant level of uncertainty, reflected in the width of the confidence interval; however, the probability of being below the depletion threshold is negligible.

The FIP aims to promote collaboration between the government, users of the fishery, and scientific advisors to achieve the objectives of sustainability of the fishery, minimize its impact on the ecosystem and improve its governance.

 

The Chilean seabass (Patagonian toothfish) Fishery Improvement Project (FIP) aims to improve the status of the fishery to a standard that will allow it to pass a full assessment of a well-established, science-based certification program, such as the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

FIP at a Glance

View current status
June 01, 2023
18% 82%
Progress Rating (A) Advanced Progress

Reserved for comprehensive FIPs that have achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within the past 12 months.

(B) Good Progress

A basic FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within 12 months.

(C) Some Recent Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months that has never achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result but has reported a Stage 3 activity within the first 12 months.
(D) Some Past Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months BUT has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old AND a Stage 3 activity has been reported within six months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
(E) Negligible Progress
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old, with no Stage 3 activity reported in the last six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months with no Stage 3 activity reported within 12 months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.

The ratings are currently derived by SFP from publicly available data on FIP websites, including FisheryProgress.org, and are determined using the following methodology: View PDF

C Some Recent Progress
Actions Complete

This pie chart represents completed environmental actions. Non-completed environmental actions may contain completed sub-tasks that are not illustrated here. For more information on environmental action progress visit the Actions Progress tab.

  • Complete
  • Incomplete
Next Update Due FisheryProgress requires a FIP to provide update reports every six months, and two missed reports will render the FIP inactive. If a report is overdue, this date will appear red.
Jul 2024
Target End Date
Jun 2026

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
Centro de Estudios Pesqueros (CEPES)
Organization Type 
Consultant
Primary Contact 
Sarah Hopf González
Email 
Phone 
+56984563982
Organization Name 
Centro de Estudios Pesqueros (CEPES)
Organization Type 
Consultant
Primary Contact 
Patricia Ruiz Opazo
Email 
Phone 
+5695884668
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
20838

Overview

This FIP has entered into the full assessment process for MSC certification and remains active on FisheryProgress, but reporting requirements are reduced. The FIP no longer reports on environmental progress but will confirm its full assessment status at each progress report due date. The FIP will continue meet the social responsibility progress reporting requirements until it achieves MSC certification.

Date Entered Full Assessment: Apr 2023

In Full Assessment Link

The fishery being assessed is the Pacific Tuna Longline Fishery targeting albacore (Thunnus alalunga), bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna across all regions of the Pacific Ocean.

The Pacific Tuna Longline Fishery aims to meet the rising global demand for tuna in a sustainable manner by assuring catches do not exceed sustainable levels, promoting the ecosystem based approach to fisheries management and strengthening policy and governance systems in the region.

Pacific Tuna Longline Fishery goals:

  • Sustainable Fish Stocks – To ensure tuna and other primary species catches across the Pacific Ocean do not exceed sustainable levels
  • Minimising Environmental Impacts – To promote the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management
  • Effective Management – To strengthen governance systems in the WCPFC, IATTC and Pacific Tuna Longline fishery.

This FIP was previously part of the Pacific Ocean Tuna - longline (Thai Union) FIP. Half of the UoAs (Vanuatu flagged vessels) are now within the MSC assessment due to the progress they have made. Due to this, the FIP profile was split to allow for the remaining fleet (Chinese flagged vessels) to continue on with their FIP.

This FIP has now entered MSC assessment, the ACDR is published in the supporting documents section and the link to the Track a Fishery profile can be found here

The fishery being assessed is the Pacific Tuna Longline Fishery targeting albacore (Thunnus alalunga), bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna across all regions of the Pacific Ocean.

The Pacific Tuna Longline Fishery aims to meet the rising global demand for tuna in a sustainable manner by assuring catches do not exceed sustainable levels, promoting the ecosystem based approach to fisheries management and strengthening policy and governance systems in the region.

FIP at a Glance

View current status
December 01, 2017
18% 29% 54%
Progress Rating (A) Advanced Progress

Reserved for comprehensive FIPs that have achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within the past 12 months.

(B) Good Progress

A basic FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within 12 months.

(C) Some Recent Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months that has never achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result but has reported a Stage 3 activity within the first 12 months.
(D) Some Past Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months BUT has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old AND a Stage 3 activity has been reported within six months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
(E) Negligible Progress
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old, with no Stage 3 activity reported in the last six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months with no Stage 3 activity reported within 12 months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.

The ratings are currently derived by SFP from publicly available data on FIP websites, including FisheryProgress.org, and are determined using the following methodology: View PDF

A Advanced Progress
Actions Complete

This pie chart represents completed environmental actions. Non-completed environmental actions may contain completed sub-tasks that are not illustrated here. For more information on environmental action progress visit the Actions Progress tab.

  • Complete
  • Incomplete
Next Update Due FisheryProgress requires a FIP to provide update reports every six months, and two missed reports will render the FIP inactive. If a report is overdue, this date will appear red.
Mar 2024
Target End Date
Dec 2024

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
Key Traceability Ltd.
Primary Contact 
Tom Evans
Phone 
+44 7505122728
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
18785

Overview

The fishery being assessed is the Pacific Ocean LL Tuna FIP (Cheng Hung Seafood Frozen Produce Co., Ltd.) fishery. The fishery targets albacore (Thunnus alalunga), bigeye (T. obesus), yellowfin (T. albacares) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) tuna. The pelagic longline vessels are flagged to Taiwan and Vanuatu and fish on the high seas and occasionally in the national Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands. The fishery is managed regionally by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) and by the Inter American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO).

The fishery being assessed is the Pacific Ocean LL Tuna FIP (Cheng Hung Seafood Frozen Produce Co., Ltd.) fishery. The fishery targets albacore (Thunnus alalunga), bigeye (T. obesus), yellowfin (T. albacares) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) tuna. The pelagic longline vessels are flagged to Taiwan and Vanuatu and fish on the high seas and occasionally in the national Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands.

FIP at a Glance

View current status
August 01, 2022
7% 21% 71%
Progress Rating (A) Advanced Progress

Reserved for comprehensive FIPs that have achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within the past 12 months.

(B) Good Progress

A basic FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within 12 months.

(C) Some Recent Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months that has never achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result but has reported a Stage 3 activity within the first 12 months.
(D) Some Past Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months BUT has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old AND a Stage 3 activity has been reported within six months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
(E) Negligible Progress
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old, with no Stage 3 activity reported in the last six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months with no Stage 3 activity reported within 12 months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.

The ratings are currently derived by SFP from publicly available data on FIP websites, including FisheryProgress.org, and are determined using the following methodology: View PDF

C Some Recent Progress
Actions Complete

This pie chart represents completed environmental actions. Non-completed environmental actions may contain completed sub-tasks that are not illustrated here. For more information on environmental action progress visit the Actions Progress tab.

  • Complete
  • Incomplete
Next Update Due FisheryProgress requires a FIP to provide update reports every six months, and two missed reports will render the FIP inactive. If a report is overdue, this date will appear red.
Aug 2024
Target End Date
Jul 2027

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
Key Traceability
Organization Type 
Consultant
Primary Contact 
Tom Evans
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
18626

Overview

AGAC has recently assessed its tropical tuna fishery against the MSC Fisheries Standard - it resulted in the certification of the yellowfin tuna stock, which was one of the three Units of Assessment (for more information on this process, click here).

With its Eastern Pacific Ocean skipjack & bigeye tuna - purse seine FIP, the goal is to contribute to the improvement of skipjack and bigeye tuna stock status in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, more specifically in the IATTC area of purview, as these stocks did not meet the MSC requirements in the aforementioned assessment. For that, the work here will focus only on the PIs that did not meet SG80 (mainly the ones that might not be fully tackled by the MSC Certification's Client Action Plan, more specifically to resolve the non-binding conditions that were set) and on the recommendations made by the CAB.

This FIP was developed exclusively by AGAC.

(NB: AGAC = Asociación de Grandes Atuneros Congeladores = Association of Large Tuna Freezers; please note that the denomination OPAGAC [Organización de Productores de Grandes Atuneros Congeladores] is contained in AGAC and refers to vessels flagged in the EU. While the name "OPAGAC" is more widely known, it is AGAC that integrates all the vessels in the association)

AGAC has recently assessed its tropical tuna fishery against the MSC Fisheries Standard - it resulted in the certification of the yellowfin tuna stock, which was one of the three Units of Assessment (for more information on this process, click here).

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
AGAC - Asociación de Grandes Atuneros Congeladores
Organization Type 
Industry
Primary Contact 
Isadora Moniz
Email 
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
17997

Overview

Se ha implementado un Proyecto de Mejoramiento Pesquero (FIP) para la pesquería de palangre de  Mahi mahi ( Coryphaena hippurus ) ecuatoriana.

La siguiente información se utiliza para describir la pesquería y determinar la Unidad de Evaluación (UoA). La UoA se define por la(s) población(es) objetivo combinadas con el método/arte y práctica de pesca (incluidos los tipos de embarcaciones) que persiguen esa población, y cualquier flota, o grupo de embarcaciones, u operadores de pesca individuales u otros pescadores elegibles que sean incluidos en esta evaluación. En algunas pesquerías, la UoA puede definirse con mayor precisión en función de las temporadas de pesca específicas y/o áreas que se incluyen.

Especies

Dorado ( Coryphaena hippurus )

Ubicación de la pesquería

Ubicación de la pesca FAO 87 dentro de la ZEE ecuatoriana y más allá de la jurisdicción nacional

Equipo y método

Palangre Artesanal

Autoridad de gestión

MPCEIP

Número de buques registrados

89 embarcaciones artesanales

Tipo y tamaño de embarcación

Buques palangreros artesanales con capacidad de carga promedio de 60 TM, 18-24 m de eslora. También llamados buques nodriza seguidos de un máximo de 10 embarcaciones cada una llevando su propia línea de anzuelo.

Se ha implementado un Proyecto de Mejoramiento Pesquero (FIP) para la pesquería de palangre de  Mahi mahi ( Coryphaena hippurus ) ecuatoriana.

FIP at a Glance

View current status
October 01, 2021
18% 39% 7% 36%
Progress Rating (A) Advanced Progress

Reserved for comprehensive FIPs that have achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within the past 12 months.

(B) Good Progress

A basic FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within 12 months.

(C) Some Recent Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months that has never achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result but has reported a Stage 3 activity within the first 12 months.
(D) Some Past Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months BUT has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old AND a Stage 3 activity has been reported within six months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
(E) Negligible Progress
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old, with no Stage 3 activity reported in the last six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months with no Stage 3 activity reported within 12 months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.

The ratings are currently derived by SFP from publicly available data on FIP websites, including FisheryProgress.org, and are determined using the following methodology: View PDF

B Good Progress
Actions Complete

This pie chart represents completed environmental actions. Non-completed environmental actions may contain completed sub-tasks that are not illustrated here. For more information on environmental action progress visit the Actions Progress tab.

  • Complete
  • Incomplete
Next Update Due FisheryProgress requires a FIP to provide update reports every six months, and two missed reports will render the FIP inactive. If a report is overdue, this date will appear red.
May 2024
Target End Date
Sep 2027

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
Asociación de Producción Pesquera de Armadores de Manta (ASOAMAN)
Organization Type 
Industry
Primary Contact 
Francisco Javier Alarcón Holguín
Phone 
+593988145569
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
17337

Overview

Perupez, Sakana del Peru, and Redes-Sostenibilidad Pesquera have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to design a FIP with the ultimate goal of achieving MSC certifiable status for the common eel (Ophichthus remiger) fishery between the regions from Tumbes to Piura. This FIP has also received the support of Sustainable Fisheries Partnership.

The fishing companies Perupez y Sakana del Peru have access to the fisheries of the Anguilla through smaller-scale fishing permits. They also process and export products to various markets across the globe including Korea, Japan, the United States, Russia, Spain, and Vietnam. These companies promoted the development and establishment of the eel fishing ordinance regulation in the year 2011 with the purpose of establishing fisheries management measures for rational and sustainable exploitation of the eel (Ophichthus remiger) fishing resource, harmonizing the participation of agents involved in the extraction and processing of eel, and contributing to the development of the industry for direct human consumption.

Fishing area: The fishing areas of the eel fleet are located in Tumbes (from Zorritos to the south of Punta Sal) and Piura (to the north and south of Talara and from Paita to the south of Parachique), with extractive activity centered in the province of Sechura-Piura region.

Fishing fleet: The smaller scale fleet dedicated to the catch eel is composed of 18 fishing boats ranging in length from 5.18 meters to 16.72 meters. These fishery boats generally carry an average of 800 traps per boat and have the capacity to receive between 1 and 3 TM of raw material.

Capture method: The common eel is caught whit traps made of gray PVC pipes, measuring about 70 cm in length and 15 cm in diameter. They are closed at each end with a plastic lid that has an opening of about 5 mm between the inlet guides and additional holes at both ends of the trap, which ensure the flow of water through the traps. The cap of the opening is white and clearly visible in the dark waters to attract attention. The traps are filled with bait consisting of anchovies, mackerel and black skipjack or tambourine. The traps are left on the seabed for about 3 hours, then the collection of the traps is started with a hydraulic system that allows lifting the lines of the spinel with the traps. The captured eel is deposited in an isolated cellar containing seawater that keeps the resource alive for further processing in that condition.


 

 

 

Perupez, Sakana del Peru, and Redes-Sostenibilidad Pesquera have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to design a FIP with the ultimate goal of achieving MSC certifiable status for the common eel (Ophichthus remiger) fishery between the regions from Tumbes to Piura. This FIP has also received the support of Sustainable Fisheries Partnership.

FIP at a Glance

View current status
November 01, 2021
36% 64%
Progress Rating (A) Advanced Progress

Reserved for comprehensive FIPs that have achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within the past 12 months.

(B) Good Progress

A basic FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within 12 months.

(C) Some Recent Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months that has never achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result but has reported a Stage 3 activity within the first 12 months.
(D) Some Past Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months BUT has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old AND a Stage 3 activity has been reported within six months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
(E) Negligible Progress
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old, with no Stage 3 activity reported in the last six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months with no Stage 3 activity reported within 12 months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.

The ratings are currently derived by SFP from publicly available data on FIP websites, including FisheryProgress.org, and are determined using the following methodology: View PDF

A Advanced Progress
Actions Complete

This pie chart represents completed environmental actions. Non-completed environmental actions may contain completed sub-tasks that are not illustrated here. For more information on environmental action progress visit the Actions Progress tab.

  • Complete
  • Incomplete
Next Update Due FisheryProgress requires a FIP to provide update reports every six months, and two missed reports will render the FIP inactive. If a report is overdue, this date will appear red.
Apr 2024
Target End Date
Nov 2024

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
Perupez S.A.C.
Organization Type 
Industry
Primary Contact 
Dario Magno Alvites Diestra
Organization Name 
Sakana del Perú S.A.
Organization Type 
Industry
Primary Contact 
Seiki Nakagawa
Organization Name 
Redes-Sostenibilidad Pesquera
Organization Type 
NGO
Primary Contact 
Jorge de Jesús Grillo Núñez
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
16484

Overview

FRIGOLAB SANMATEO, PROPEMAR y TRANSMARINA trabajarán juntos para lograr la certificación del Marine Stewardship Council para la pesquería.

Este Proyecto de Mejora de la Pesquería se basa en los resultados de la Preevaluación del MSC de la pesquería de palangre de pez espada (Xiphias gladius) realizada por la consultora independiente Cynthia Fernández en marzo de 2019.

En esta preevaluación se identificaron dos Unidades de Certificación (UoC):

UoC1: Flota palangrera artesanal ecuatoriana (Nodrizas)

  • Equipo: Palangre
  • Especies de destino: Pez espada (Xiphias gladius)
  • Valor: Pacífico Sureste (EPO)
  • Zonas de pesca: Zona FAO 87/ ZEE ecuatoriana
  • OROP: CIAT

UoC2: Flota palangrera industrial ecuatoriana

  • Equipo: Palangre
  • Especie de destino: Pez espada (Xiphias gladius)
  • Valor: Pacífico Sureste (EPO)
  • Zonas de pesca: Zona FAO 87
  • OROP: CIAT

Los caladeros de la pesquería artesanal de grandes pelágicos ecuatoriano se ubican entre los 05°00'N y 15°00'S, y hasta el meridiano 100°00'O del archipiélago de Galápagos. Las pesquerías artesanales ecuatorianas son pesquerías de especies múltiples que operan durante todo el año y están definidas por dos temporadas principales relacionadas con las especies de peces pelágicos grandes objetivo. Uno está orientado principalmente a la pesca de dorado y el otro incluye atunes, peces picudos y tiburones. 

Esta pesquería comenzó gradualmente a mediados de los años 1970, pero experimentó una expansión importante durante los años 1990 y 2000. Las zonas de pesca tradicionales, que inicialmente se encontraban a menos de 40 m de la costa, se han ido ampliando con el paso de los años hasta los 1.400 m de la costa continental, pasando por el archipiélago de Galápagos, estableciendo lo que hoy se conoce como la "pesquería oceánico-artesanal" en Ecuador.

La flota artesanal está constituida por un buque nodriza (mother ship) que se define como un buque pesquero que remolca una serie de palangreros artesanales (fabricados en fibra de vidrio) hasta caladeros lejanos, y cuya finalidad es pescar, abastecer de agua, combustible, viveros, cebos y otros insumos pesqueros y a su vez almacenar en sus granjas las capturas obtenidas por los buques pesqueros artesanales (Acuerdo 407. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería, Acuacultura y Pesca. 12 de octubre de 2011- Art. 1). En la pesquería de picudos (incluido el pez espada y otros pelágicos de mayor tamaño) se permitirán hasta un máximo de seis pequeños arrastreros de fibra de vidrio (Acuerdo 407. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería, Acuacultura y Pesca. 12 de octubre de 2011- Art. 3). En 2019 el número de naves nodriza fue de 106 según datos de la Subsecretaría de Recursos Pesqueros. Se estima que las operaciones con buques nodriza producen hasta el 80% de la captura total de la pesquería artesanal.

La pesca en alta mar no está regulada por ninguna medida de gestión excepto la prohibición de pescar en aguas de Galápagos.

La flota de palangre industrial está compuesta por buques de hasta 50 m de eslora, con artes motorizados para palangre de profundidad media que se dirige a una variedad de grandes especies pelágicas, incluidos atunes y peces picudos. En 2019, la flota estaría compuesta por 93 embarcaciones, según información proporcionada por la Subsecretaría de Recursos Pesqueros.

FRIGOLAB SANMATEO, PROPEMAR y TRANSMARINA trabajarán juntos para lograr la certificación del Marine Stewardship Council para la pesquería.

Este Proyecto de Mejora de la Pesquería se basa en los resultados de la Preevaluación del MSC de la pesquería de palangre de pez espada (Xiphias gladius) realizada por la consultora independiente Cynthia Fernández en marzo de 2019.

FIP at a Glance

View current status
June 01, 2021
36% 46% 14% 4%
Progress Rating (A) Advanced Progress

Reserved for comprehensive FIPs that have achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within the past 12 months.

(B) Good Progress

A basic FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result within 12 months.

(C) Some Recent Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months that has never achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result but has reported a Stage 3 activity within the first 12 months.
(D) Some Past Progress
  • A FIP that has achieved a Stage 4 or 5 result in more than 12 (but less than 24) months BUT has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old AND a Stage 3 activity has been reported within six months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.
(E) Negligible Progress
  • A FIP for which the most recent Stage 4 or 5 result is more than 24 (but less than 36) months old, with no Stage 3 activity reported in the last six months.
  • A FIP younger than 12 months with no Stage 3 activity reported within 12 months.
  • A FIP 12-36 months old that has never reported a Stage 4 or 5 result AND has not reported a Stage 3 activity within the past six months.

The ratings are currently derived by SFP from publicly available data on FIP websites, including FisheryProgress.org, and are determined using the following methodology: View PDF

A Advanced Progress
Actions Complete

This pie chart represents completed environmental actions. Non-completed environmental actions may contain completed sub-tasks that are not illustrated here. For more information on environmental action progress visit the Actions Progress tab.

  • Complete
  • Incomplete
Next Update Due FisheryProgress requires a FIP to provide update reports every six months, and two missed reports will render the FIP inactive. If a report is overdue, this date will appear red.
Sep 2024
Target End Date
Dec 2024
Additional Impacts:
Traceability

FIP Leads

Organization Name 
FIP for Swordfish - Independent Consultant
Organization Type 
Consultant
Primary Contact 
Guillermo Morán
Phone 
+593984814782
FIP Identification Number The FIP Identification Number is automatically generated by FisheryProgress when a FIP profile is created. While the number itself is not meaningful, they are used by NGOs, academia, and industry to refer to FIPs in a consistent way.
15810

Pages

Subscribe to Area 87 (Pacific, Southeast)