The project supports efforts by the Hawaii Seafood Council and Hawaii longline fleet to improve the fishery for Hawaii pelagic seafood products. An MSC pre-assessment of this fishery was completed in 2009, updated in 2013, redone in 2014 with peer review from WCPFC and WPRFMC scientists, and updated in 2016.
Current status: The status of bigeye tuna in the Western and Central Pacific is improving with a catch rate (fishing mortality rate F) equal or lesser to the rate at maximum sustained yield (Fmsy) (August 2017). An alternative spatial / regional structure is recommended, based on recent analysis of tagging data from across the Pacific. See: https://www.wcpfc.int/system/files/SS2-Agenda%202.1_TT%20CMM%20meeting%2...
The fishery is close to meeting the MSC standard and actions are focused on meeting at least a score of 80 on all MSC indicators, including the indicator for the status of bigeye tuna, which is experiencing overfishing at the stock level (MSC indicator 1.1.1).
The Hawaii Seafood Council represents diverse fisheries stakeholders and the Hawaii Longline Association represents the fleet.
In 2016 and 2017, the Hawaii Seafood Council and Hawaii Longline Association are focusing on improving conditions for crew welfare, specifically acting to ensure all terms of work for crew are clear and consistent with a workplace code of conduct that meets U.S. and international best practice and may be verified independently.
The project supports efforts by the Hawaii Seafood Council and Hawaii longline fleet to improve the fishery for Hawaii pelagic seafood products. An MSC pre-assessment of this fishery was completed in 2009, updated in 2013, redone in 2014 with pee
1. Contribute to better management for bigeye tuna, including spatially deaggregated management for bigeye tuna in 2014-2017.
2. Crew welfare: clear and consistent working conditions which can be verified independently, 2016-2018.
How is this FIP Doing?
FisheryProgress.org uses 28 industry-standard indicators based on the Marine Stewardship Council Fisheries Standard to track FIP progress. Comprehensive FIPs must address all red and yellow indicators, while basic FIPs may address only a subset of indicators.
The first bar below shows a snapshot of the FIP’s current performance against the indicators. The second bar below shows the FIP’s performance against the indicators when it started so you can see how much progress the FIP has made over time. Both bars use the following scale: Red=below 60, Yellow=60-79, Green=80 or higher, Gray=the subset of indicators a basic FIP is not addressing.